Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: A comment/question on the Grease "book"


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
A comment/question on the Grease "book"
Permalink Closed


I've been reading a lot of posts about changes that should be made, and one that keeps coming up is that they need to make the book make more sense. I've seen the show a ton of times, and while the excitement of the cast and the fun of the show can take your mind off of it, the storyline has always made more sense in the movie. I think the hard part is that the Danny/Sandy story is really the only part of the plot that stretches from the beginning to the end, and since they were made the leads of the movie version, that gave the thinly plotted show at least a story to follow as the vignettes of the other characters came and went. Like many people on the board, I've always found it strange how much better the movie flows than the stage show, and I have to feel if they had the ability to severly alter the script of the show, it would have been done a long time ago. (You have to realize this revival is the first Broadway production to get the rights to use the added movie songs from almost thirty years ago, and it wasn't for lack of trying!) My guess, especially with Jim Jacobs involved, is that they don't have the rights to really alter the script to a large extent, and on top of that are probably limited to what they can take from the movie since another scriptwriter would be involved. While I doubt it was authorized or legal, has anyone seen a major production done with the movie script or more of the movie "flow" in mind? How did that work? Or has anyone heard of a production of Grease stopped for trying to alter the show? (I've seen it happen with other shows!)

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 680
Date:
A comment/question on the Grease "book"
Permalink Closed


Samuel French, Inc., the rights holders are extremely strict about not changing the show, and if they get wind of an alteration, the production is stopped immediately. Recent memory is of an all-girl production in '05 that was stopped (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4667355).

Jim Jacobs is notorious for putting stops to productions that are done without permission. He sued carnival cruises last year for doing the show 356 times without paying him a cent (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/15/nyregion/15cruise.html?ex=1297659600&en=e8a443d63d0268f9&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss).

I actually saw a junior high school production three years ago that used the movie script, from Love is a Many Splendored Thing to Blue Moon...and karaoke tracks to go with them. Boy did that suck.

That said, I still wonder who did the rewrites for this production...I'm sure Jacobs was involved, but I can't imagine he'd let his "intellectual property" get this out of hand or changed enough that it's no longer true to what he and Casey wrote. However, just "Danny and Chacha leaving after the dance" alone kills the plot.

As an aside, the movie songs have been used in productions before - in tours and David Ian's last London production...just never Broadway, and never in the bizarre way that they're used now.

-- Edited by MrE1111 at 13:12, 2007-08-04

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard